The Leader’s Romance: When the Map Matters More Than the Man
By KC | Published January 2026
We are witnessing a strange and tragic love affair. It is not between two people, but between the Ruler and the War. For the common man, conflict is a tragedy—the loss of a roof, a limb, or a child. But for the Leader, war often feels like a romance. It is the ultimate seduction of legacy.
The Seduction of the Geopolitical Chessboard
We see this intoxication in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, where the pursuit of historical "glory" has turned vibrant cities into graveyards. This isn't new; we saw it when Napoleon marched toward Moscow, obsessed with a map he couldn't conquer.
To the people on the ground, the land is "home," but to the ambitious eye looking down from a high office, the land is merely a piece on a chessboard. The Leader falls in love with the idea of victory, forgetting that the ink used to draw these new borders is the blood of their own people.
Note: If you’re wondering why we act so differently once we reach certain milestones, check out my previous post on
to see how our internal identities shift with the times. (Link) The Great Age Glitch
The Death of the "Good Neighbour" Concept
We have lost the most ancient of survival instincts: the sanctity of the neighbour. Geography is destiny. Whether it is the long-standing friction between India and Pakistan or the recent tensions between Venezuela and Guyana, we see nations that share climates and histories turning into bitter rivals.
But are they truly rivals? Or are they being pushed? According to the
The Friction of Over-Ambitious Migration
We are also living in an era of Over-Ambitious Migration. This is a sensitive observation: when movement is used as a political tool or happens so fast that integration fails, the "native landscape" is disturbed.
We see the unease in native populations—not out of hate, but out of a loss of identity. It’s a repeat of the tensions seen during the
The Irony of Faith and Religious Fundamentalism
Perhaps the greatest tragedy is the irony of the Altar. In the Gaza conflict and beyond, we see flags of faith being waved on battlefields. We have weaponised the gods. Every major faith is rooted in a variation of "Live and Let Live." The core tenet is Peace. Yet, we see the very protectors of these faiths fueling the wars that destroy the faithful.
Conclusion: Living with the Ashes
The Leader gets his page in the history books. The Third Party gets to sell their weapons. The Fundamentalist gets his recruits. But what do we get? We get a world where the map is constantly changing, but the suffering remains the same.
Maybe it is time we stopped looking at the borders and started looking at the neighbour again. When the smoke clears, the Leader retreats to a palace, but we still have to live next to the ashes.
Thanks,

Comments
Post a Comment