The Leader’s Romance: When the Map Matters More Than the Man

Conceptual world map art showing the "Leader's Romance" with war, featuring tanks, fire, and people displaced by global conflict in Russia, Ukraine, and Gaza.

By KC
| Published January 2026

We are witnessing a strange and tragic love affair. It is not between two people, but between the Ruler and the War. For the common man, conflict is a tragedy—the loss of a roof, a limb, or a child. But for the Leader, war often feels like a romance. It is the ultimate seduction of legacy.

The Seduction of the Geopolitical Chessboard

We see this intoxication in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, where the pursuit of historical "glory" has turned vibrant cities into graveyards. This isn't new; we saw it when Napoleon marched toward Moscow, obsessed with a map he couldn't conquer.

To the people on the ground, the land is "home," but to the ambitious eye looking down from a high office, the land is merely a piece on a chessboard. The Leader falls in love with the idea of victory, forgetting that the ink used to draw these new borders is the blood of their own people.

 Note: If you’re wondering why we act so differently once we reach certain milestones, check out my previous post on The Great Age Glitch to see how our internal identities shift with the times. (Link)

The Death of the "Good Neighbour" Concept

We have lost the most ancient of survival instincts: the sanctity of the neighbour. Geography is destiny. Whether it is the long-standing friction between India and Pakistan or the recent tensions between Venezuela and Guyana, we see nations that share climates and histories turning into bitter rivals.

But are they truly rivals? Or are they being pushed? According to the 2025 Global Peace Index, regional stability is often compromised by external pressures. We often see two neighbours who have lived in a "cold peace" until a Third Party enters. This "distanced friend" with a heavy wallet whispers into ears, handing one a stone to throw at the other. They ignite the fire and then leave, while the neighbours are left to burn in a house they both share.

The Friction of Over-Ambitious Migration

We are also living in an era of Over-Ambitious Migration. This is a sensitive observation: when movement is used as a political tool or happens so fast that integration fails, the "native landscape" is disturbed.

We see the unease in native populations—not out of hate, but out of a loss of identity. It’s a repeat of the tensions seen during the historical partitions of the 20th century. A landscape can only hold so many contradictions before it fractures. We must remember that every land has a rhythm; forcing a new beat upon it too quickly creates noise, not music.

The Irony of Faith and Religious Fundamentalism

Perhaps the greatest tragedy is the irony of the Altar. In the Gaza conflict and beyond, we see flags of faith being waved on battlefields. We have weaponised the gods. Every major faith is rooted in a variation of "Live and Let Live." The core tenet is Peace. Yet, we see the very protectors of these faiths fueling the wars that destroy the faithful.

Conclusion: Living with the Ashes

The Leader gets his page in the history books. The Third Party gets to sell their weapons. The Fundamentalist gets his recruits. But what do we get? We get a world where the map is constantly changing, but the suffering remains the same.

Maybe it is time we stopped looking at the borders and started looking at the neighbour again. When the smoke clears, the Leader retreats to a palace, but we still have to live next to the ashes.


Thanks,
KC


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Myth of Relevance: On Masks, Humans, and the Loneliness Behind Self-Love

The Beauty of a Boring Life

Layers of Us: What Onions Teach Us About Love and Loss